Home » Bizarre

Dead Monster Washes Ashore in Montauk

Submitted by The Amazing on Thursday, 15 January 200915 Comments

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/07/IMG_1883_3_.JPG

No, Lizzie Grubman’s still alive. This is an actual monster, some sort of rodent-like creature with a dinosaur beak. A tipster says that there is “a government animal testing facility very close by in Long Island,” but unless the government is trying to design horrible Montauk monsters that will eat IEDs and fart fire at bad Iraqis, we’re not sure why they would create such an unthinkable beast. Our guess is that it’s viral marketing for something. Ali Lohan’s new album perhaps. Click thru for larger dino-damage.

Popularity: 67% [?]

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

15 Comments »

  • Martin Lewis said:

    I think it was a viral for a film, but can’t remember which one.

  • Jenny said:

    Hello. Great job. I did not expect this on a Wednesday. This is a great story. Thanks!

  • Anonymous said:

    I actually think its real. It isn’t a monster though, but a raccoon. I read it on a comedy website but they do post info on interesting things. Heres the link http://www.cracked.com/blog/the-truth-behind-5-real-monsters-that-fooled-the-internet

  • SouthEastGirl said:

    BAD IRAQIS??!! i think AMERICA’S GOVERNMENT are the bad ever…i mean

  • Erin said:

    “Anonymous” is correct. It’s only a raccoon. The structure of the body and the skull match a racoon’s perfectly.

  • Webcomic for Catherine said:

    Raccoon.

  • Peter said:

    Ha, I like how it’s flipping everyone off. Screw you too, monster!

  • angel said:

    i believe the goverment is doing testing to bad the world is going to end anyways very soon

  • Jesse Mac said:

    i dont know what kind of raccoons you people are seeing.. but from what i know, raccoons do not have beaks.. and they also have fur, ears, tail.. ect…

  • Graddy said:

    Now that ive looked at it closer maybe a snapping sea turtle or just a snapping turtle without its shell with its picture taken close up ?

  • Alex said:

    So how are you so sure it actually is a raccoon? I’m just curious because its body is hairless with thin skin an a beak like structure. Raccoons as far as I know it never normally have beaks. I’m just looking for some clarification here. :)

  • Jack said:

    It is a damn turtle, guys!
    A f*cking turtle!

  • Graddy said:

    thank you jack agrees with me ….i just wanna know why my fucking other post making fun of all u little fuckin dumb shits was erased then my 2 post i did was takin off then reposted that shit aint funny motherfuckers…so far jack n i r the smartest ones that have seen this …o one more thing i was drunk n high as a motherfucker when i posted that shit n i guessed it right n none of u other fucks did hahah

    bitches

  • Hla Khine said:

    This looks like genetic experiment gone wrong…. Sperm cells from one animal specie cross-fertilized with the ovum from another species.

  • Anonymous2 said:

    I really don’t know what it is, would be cool to discover it’s true identity. It’s sad it didn’t survive it’s trip. Poor weird eerie thing. Your in a better place now, I hope. R.I.P

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.